We frequently hear critics argue that U.S. students can’t write well and that there is a “literacy crisis” in the U.S. What is the origin of these discourses? What do they have to do with immigration, national security, and economics? How does the notion that Americans can’t write drive the national push to test writing? Here we explore the history of writing and testing in the U.S., the “science” and technology of testing approaches, and how the rhetoric of assessment impacts the lives of Americans today.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Comparing Slave Narratives

Last semester, I took a black feminist literature class here at Penn State. The class had us reading plenty of slave narratives, all written by females. In our class discussions of Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl (another one of the stories in our book), our professor had us note several differences between male slave narratives and female slave narratives. One was the difference between how men wrote about how they achieved their freedom and how women wrote about it.


Frederick Douglass' tale of achieving freedom seems to be mostly attributed to his own hard work. Through using various methods to teach himself how to read and write, standing up to his master in a physical confrontation, and sometimes sheer effort of will, Douglass seems to earn his freedom by his own means. However in Incidents, Harriet Jacobs continually addresses the fact that she would not have been able to achieve her freedom without the help of others. Frederick does acknowledge a few places in his book when he purposefully omits names (in order to not implicate certain people in the crime of helping a slave), but his narrative style focuses the burdens on himself.

It is noteworthy to say that Douglass did not have children as Jacobs did. With the extra burden of acquiring the freedom of her children, Jacobs had a lessened ability to simply run away. She also felt a strong familial connection with her grandmother who Jacobs did not want to leave behind either. Indeed, in comparing these two narratives, it seems that connections of any kind hinder the slave from obtaining freedom. This can also be seen when Douglass' group of friends is stopped from running away due to other slaves that had betrayed their plans to their masters.

The main point I'm trying to make here is the difference of opinion between Douglass and Jacobs towards their emancipation from slavery. Douglass wrote from a very individualistic point of view. Indeed, at one point in his narrative Douglass says that he could not even trust people of his own color. He very well might have been a firm believer in the quote, "if you want anything done right, you have to do it yourself." Overall, Douglass takes a stereotypical male view in his narrative. Jacobs makes use of her friendships and community to achieve freedom and gives plenty of credit to those who helped her. Her collectivist view comes across constantly as she mentions those who help hide, house, and transport her to freedom.

Do you think there is a better view or a right view? Do you think that Douglass left out the names and stories of others who may have had a helping hand in his escape?

1 comment:

Conor Hall said...

In a situation such as trying to become emancipated, I don't think there is a right, or better way in doing it. In my opinion, for myself, I think Douglass' approach would work better for me. I do have very strong connections to my family- though the connections would be completely different for me going through what Douglass did- and know that I would use that support system for help.

I think the reason these two stories are written in the style they are, has to do with the ideology of people back then. These books were meant to break stereotypes of color, not gender, and these stories were crafted in such ways to not only shock readers and let them know about the hardships of slavery, but to also make the readers relate and feel that black women are the same as white women as with the men. Although I didn't read the Jacobs piece I already get a feeling that she NEEDED all this help and support to become free, almost like a damsel in distress. Just as I feel Douglass got more help than he lets on, I think Jacobs did more for herself than she lets on.

Books that are written as self biographical success stories such as these, or ones about CEO's, movie stars, or professional athletes all do the same thing. They write the story to summarize a lifetime of experiences into a generalized view of "how they made it" using a very limited amount of stories as reference. So I guess their isn't a right or better view since they both lead to their success in being free.